This story is part of a larger article on designing the Train Stations of Tomorrow. Read the full article here.

Nils works on two conceptual models for improving train stations. “At my firm, we base our work on a EMC2B approach: energy, material, carbon, climate, and biodiversity. These five themes challenge the potential impact of our construction and inform any design from the start. Especially difficult is biodiversity, which does not speak for itself but requires a representative stakeholder.” The other model is ‘urban metabolism’: analysing all the in- and outflows of an existing station. This approach can highlight where sustainability gains can be made, or where to apply circular innovations. “For example, which machines in a train station use the most electricity? Many old stations have no idea!”

In the eyes of Nils, each train station has a unique metabolism consisting of myriad in- and outflows. “Stations of the future should master these flows to become as circular and low-impact as possible.” | Illustration made by and owned by Nils le Bot.

Nils pictures the train station of the future as circular material and energy systems which are fully permeable for living beings. “Everything, from people to materials to animals, flows in and out without causing ecological damage.” Each station could be generating electricity, recycling waste, and purifying water. “That last part is vital. Currently, braking trains and weeding soil creates a lot of local water pollution. One way to tackle this issue is creating water-filtering railway stations.” At a larger scale, he imagines how the train network could function almost as a living organism, exchanging resources and materials to optimize circularity. “Bring food where it is needed, ship plastic to the best processing station… We can create a system that is both resilient and better for the planet.”

Postdoctoral researcher Nils le Bot

“For me, architecture is political: it should address social and ecological issues. One issue is overreliance on cars, which requires an increase in the viability of trains.” 

Nils grew up in Normandy: “There were not really mass transit options in my hometown.” So when he moved to Paris, he was fascinated by the intensity and complexity of its train stations. “I thought: I can work on this.” Throughout his career so far, Nils stood by his choice. Both his MSc theses concerned the ‘Grand Paris railway system’, which connects the peripheries of the metropolis. His PhD examined, among others, the historic development of four main metropolitan railway stations. And today he works for AREP, a Parisian practice which specialises in… train stations!

Nils le Bot


“For me, architecture is political: it should address social and ecological issues. One issue is overreliance on cars, which requires an increase in the viability of trains.”