Assessing and redesigning Valkenburg's flood risk management system

The geographical features in the Southern part of Limburg forces precipitation from upstream
located areas to flow through a bottleneck, which is exactly located at the city centre of Valkenburg.
This makes increasing the safety level more complicated than in other areas. The safety
level of Valkenburg has a lower standard in comparison to the rest of the country, namely 1
in 25 years. The combination of those two characteristics is not desirable. Official documents
state that this lower standard is based on detailed (societal) Cost-Benefit Analyses. In reality
however, the safety standard is based on simple back of the envelope calculations. The Limburg
Waterboard has indeed developed a Cost-Benefit tool which they could use to find out whether
the implementation of safety measures are cost effective, however they have not been able to
implement it until now. Additional safety measures to increase the safety level are assumed
too costly based on the same brief calculations. It is doubtful whether individual risk laws are
met, since the Limburg Waterboard assumes no casualties in the Geul area. The 2021 flood
however showed that this might be false for future floods which get more severe over time due
to climate change.

The citizens and entrepreneurs in Valkenburg were not completely aware of the risks they were
exposed to and their sense of safety related to flooding decreased after the flood. Most of the
people questioned in a survey demanded a higher safety level than the current standard. They
would even be open for an increase in tax to realise this improvement. Raising the quay walls
would be a cost-effective solution according to some of the citizens. However, the entrepreneurs
who rely on tourist based income, do not prefer this option due to loss in aesthetic value.
Hydraulic, structural, and non-technical solutions which are investigated in this report, have
the aim to increase the safety level or make the safety level more acceptable for citizens. The
hydraulic, and structural solutions focus on four main aspects. The first aspect is related to
the redesign of bridges in the city centre. This is mainly done by applying a flat bridges design,
which is further elaborated with a case study for the collapsed Emmalaan bridge, and a liftable
bridge design. The second aspect is related to closing the gaps in the quay walls, and increasing
the height of the quay walls. The third aspect is related to the implementation of water tunnel
concepts with six different design concepts. The fourth aspect is related to implementing parts
of Meerssen’s 4-step approach. The first three aspects of the hydraulic and structural solutions
are focused on increasing the discharge capacity of the Geul, while the latter aspect focuses
on retaining, delaying, and storing the precipitation. Non- technical solution are also proposed
that focus on making people more aware of the risk they are exposed to. This could eventually
lead to more acceptance and thus more pleased citizens.

The first order estimations for investment costs and safety level for the hydraulic, and structural
solutions are graphically displayed in order to provide an overview of possible interventions to
the municipality of Valkenburg and the Limburg waterboard. Although preliminary, and based
on limited available data, these results should encourage both stakeholders, and other relevant
parties, to reconsider safety standards and search for measures that could increase the safety
level of Valkenburg when desired.