Filter results

47671 results

Governance

Team Underlying or overarching all actions, pilots and projects proposed for the sustainable transition of TU Delft is the governance that forms the foundation of a sustainable community. Our sustainability core team deals with this theme. TU Delft intends to become an entirely sustainable organisation, not only by the measures implemented on the campus and the resulting carbon and circular performance, but also in the way the university is organised. Financial and regulative incentives (carbon pricing, Total cost of ownership, circular contracting) should steer processes towards sustainability. Total Cost of Ownership In order to support sustainable decisions, a long-term perspective on financial decisions is needed. TCO (total cost of ownership) includes exploitation costs and benefits and considers the residual value of a building or product and its materials. The capitalisation of environmental impact is also possible. Therefore, TCO will become the basis for financial decisions. Circular contracting Procurement of stationary, furniture, equipment, materials and services proved to be the greatest cause of carbon equivalent emissions at TU Delft. The embodied carbon of these products can only be tackled by a full supply chain approach, from producer to end-user. Therefore, circular contracting, which can secure the sustainable production, transport, maintenance and final stage handling, is essential to cut down on carbon emissions. We are already working with circular contracting. Internal carbon tax Based on various sources and to make amends for damages of the past, TU Delft is investigating the possibility to use a carbon price at the value of € 150 per tonne of CO2-equivalent and how to include this in its everyday financial system. This carbon price can possibly be used for financial decisions, to compare alternative plans, with selections of suppliers, for price adjustments, to define carbon budgets, and as value for an internal carbon tax (e.g. imposed on flights). Personal carbon budgets We are currently investigating the option of personal carbon budgets: a maximum CO2 emission budget that can be arranged per faculty or service department, and per employee or student. Organisational units and people can spend this budget the way they want to. A personal carbon budget can help to change behaviour and support conscientious decisions.

Book Presentation | Process Technology in the Netherlands: Past and Future

Book Presentation | Process Technology in the Netherlands: Past and Future Speech by Ernst Homburg For over a century process technology has been of crucial importance for the economic and social development of Western countries such as the Netherlands. The book Een eeuw chemische technologie in Nederland (2021) offers an overview of the development of chemical engineering and other sub-disciplines of process technology up to now. It analyzes how the field gradually acquired a more scientific basis. One after the other new subfields emerged, such as unit operations, chemical machinery and plant design, transport phenomena, catalysis, polymer science, chemical reaction engineering and biotechnology. In the Netherlands, due to an excellent collaboration between large chemical industries and the (technical universities), process technology became internationally leading, with founding fathers like Hans Kramers (transport phenomena), Dirk van Krevelen (chemical reaction engineering) and Jan de Boer (catalysis). Today the field is not just alive and kicking, but also has to face new challenges, such as reducing CO 2 -emissions, minimizing waste and becoming more cyclic and sustainable generally. A brief review will be presented of some promising technological options for enabling the energy and raw material transitions required. Examples include: electrification, C 1 -chemistry, the H 2 -economy, polymer-recycling, process intensification, the use of membranes, electrochemical conversion and multiple additional technological innovations. There is no doubt that the present societal challenges open up a world of chances and opportunities to future process engineers! Reference: Ton van Helvoort en Ernst Homburg, Een eeuw chemische technologie in Nederland. In opdracht van Stichting Hoogewerff-Fonds (Delft: Stichting Hoogewerff-Fonds, 2021). You can follow this lecture at 11:40 hrs in the CIE3 Room on Monday, April 4

Rates and Setups

Our rental and catering options show some of our standard possibilities. Of course, much more is possible, so please contact us to arrange everything according to your wishes in a personal (digital) conversation. Rates Setups Conference rooms Price per half-day *excempted from VAT Price per day *excempted from VAT Students TU Staff Regular Students TU Staff Regular Band Studio A, B en DJ Studio € 78.- € 158.- € 209.- € 122.- € 245.- € 326.- Photo Studio € 164.- € 265.- € 331.- € 231.- € 412.- € 531.- Pottery € 164.- € 265.- € 331.- € 231.- € 412.- € 531.- Woodworking Studio € 78.- € 158.- € 209.- € 122.- € 245.- € 326.- Dance Studio A € 164.- € 265.- € 331.- € 231.- € 412.- € 531.- Theatre Hall € 285.- € 467.- € 579.- € 392.- € 705.- € 896.- Dance Studio B € 164.- € 265.- € 331.- € 231.- € 412.- € 531.- Body & Mind € 164.- € 265.- € 331.- € 231.- € 412.- € 531.- Painting Studio € 164.- € 265.- € 331.- € 231.- € 412.- € 531.- Rhythm A € 164.- € 265.- € 331.- € 231.- € 412.- € 531.- Rhythm B € 164.- € 265.- € 331.- € 231.- € 412.- € 531.- Dance halls Price per hour *excempted from VAT Students TU Staff Regular Ballet Studio € 19.10 € 32.00 € 32.00 Dance Studio A € 19.10 € 32.00 € 32.00 Dance Studio B € 19.10 € 32.00 € 32.00 Rhythm A € 19.10 € 32.00 € 32.00 Rhythm B € 19.10 € 32.00 € 32.00 Visual art studios Price per hour *excempted from VAT Students TU Staff Regular Design Studio € 21.70 € 36.15 € 36.15 Painting Studio € 21.70 € 36.15 € 36.15 Photo Studio € 21.70 € 36.15 € 36.15 Pottery € 21.70 € 36.15 € 36.15 Screen Printing € 21.70 € 36.15 € 36.15 Woodworking Studio € 21.70 € 36.15 € 36.15 Sports halls Price per hour *excempted from VAT Students TU Staff Regular Aerobics € 33.00 € 53.70 € 53.70 Body & Mind € 33.00 € 53.70 € 53.70 Combat € 51.15 € 83.65 € 83.65 Climbing Wall Upon request Dojo € 36.15 € 58.90 € 58.90 Fitness Upon request Spinning € 37.75 € 61.95 € 61.95 X1 € 42.40 € 69.80 € 69.80 X2 € 42.40 € 69.80 € 69.80 X2a € 21.20 € 34.90 € 34.90 X2b € 21.20 € 34.90 € 34.90 X3 (One half) € 26.35 € 43.00 € 43.00 X3 (Entire Hall) € 48.85 € 80.60 € 80.60 Sports fields Price per hour *excempted from VAT Students TU Staff Regular Beachvolleyball field € 12.40 € 19.60 € 19.60 Artificial turf hockey € 42.40 € 69.80 € 69.80 Artificial turf soccer € 42.40 € 69.80 € 69.80 Rugby training field € 42.40 € 69.80 € 69.80 Rugby competition field € 42.40 € 69.80 € 69.80 Survival course € 50.60 € 83.65 € 83.65 Tennis court (balloon hall) € 17.00 € 27.65 € 27.65 Tennis court (outside) € 14.90 € 24.40 € 24.40 Music studios & theater hall Price per hour *excempted from VAT Students TU Staff Regular Band Studio A (per 2 hours) € 16.00 € 26.60 € 26.60 Band Studio B (per 2 hours) € 16,00 € 26,60 € 26,60 DJ Studio (per 2 hours) € 16,00 € 26,60 € 26,60 Music Studio (per 2 hours) € 16,00 € 26,60 € 26,60 Recording Sudio € 42.50 € 45.00 € 45.00 Rehearsal Studio's (per 2 hours) € 8.00 € 13.30 € 13.30 Theatre Hall € 26.60 € 59.65 € 88.60 The meeting rooms can be arranged in four different ways: square, u-set up, classroom or theater. Below you will find an overview of the number of people per arrangement per room. Square U-set up Classroom Theater Photo studio 24 18 26 50 Theatre Hall 40 30 50 175 Dance studio A 16 16 16 16 Dance studio B 14 14 14 14 Painting studio 20 16 20 30 Woodworking studio 6 6 nvt nvt Pottery studio 16 12 nvt 25 Band studio A 12 10 nvt 15 Band studio B 8 6 nvt 12 DJ Studio 8 6 nvt nvt Body & Mind 32 26 24 60 Rhythm A 20 16 20 30 Rhythm B 28 22 28 40

Half Height Horizontal

How system safety can make Machine Learning systems safer in the public sector

Machine Learning (ML), a form of AI where patterns are discovered in large amounts of data, can be very useful. It is increasingly used, for example, in chatbot Chat GPT, facial recognition, or speech software. However, there are also concerns about the use of ML systems in the public sector. How do you prevent the system from, for example, discriminating or making large-scale mistakes with negative effects on citizens? Scientists at TU Delft, including Jeroen Delfos, investigated how lessons from system safety can contribute to making ML systems safer in the public sector. “Policymakers are busy devising measures to counter the negative effects of ML. Our research shows that they can rely much more on existing concepts and theories that have already proven their value in other sectors,” says Jeroen Delfos. Jeroen Delfos Learning from other sectors In their research, the scientists used concepts from system safety and systems theory to describe the challenges of using ML systems in the public sector. Delfos: “Concepts and tools from the system safety literature are already widely used to support safety in sectors such as aviation, for example by analysing accidents with system safety methods. However, this is not yet common practice in the field of AI and ML. By applying a system-theoretical perspective, we view safety not only as a result of how the technology works, but as the result of a complex set of technical, social, and organisational factors.” The researchers interviewed professionals from the public sector to see which factors are recognized and which are still underexposed. Bias There is room for improvement to make ML systems in the public sector safer. For example, bias in data is still often seen as a technical problem, while the origin of that bias may lie far outside the technical system. Delfos: “Consider, for instance, the registration of crime. In neighbourhoods where the police patrol more frequently, logically, more crime is recorded, which leads to these areas being overrepresented in crime statistics. An ML system trained to discover patterns in these statistics will replicate or even reinforce this bias. However, the problem lies in the method of recording, not in the ML system itself.” Reducing risks According to the researchers, policymakers and civil servants involved in the development of ML systems would do well to incorporate system safety concepts. For example, it is advisable to identify in advance what kinds of accidents one wants to prevent when designing an ML system. Another lesson from system safety, for instance in aviation, is that systems tend to become more risky over time in practice, because safety becomes subordinate to efficiency as long as no accidents occur. “It is therefore important that safety remains a recurring topic in evaluations and that safety requirements are enforced,” says Delfos. Read the research paper .

Three Students Nominated for the ECHO award

Three TU Delft students have been nominated for the ECHO Award 2024. The ECHO award is awarded to students with a non-western background who are actively engaged in society. Sibel, TJ and Pravesha talk about their background their nomination. The finalists will be selected on September 27th. Sibel Gökbekir How has your background influenced your academic journey? As a woman with Turkish roots, my academic journey has been about more than just pursuing degrees in engineering and law; it’s been about consistently advocating for the diverse needs of women and multicultural groups, ensuring their voices are heard in important decisions. This is why I actively contributed to different board positions at TU Delft, working to promote inclusivity and equality. My background inspired me to explore how engineering, law, and social justice intersect, particularly in empowering marginalised communities. I chose to study energy transitions and human rights to contribute to a fairer, more inclusive World. How have you turned this into contributions to society? I’ve dedicated my academic and personal life to promoting diversity and inclusion. As a youth ambassador for Stop Street Harassment, I aimed to create safer spaces for women and minorities because I believe everyone has the right to feel free and safe in society. Through the Turkish Golden Tulip Foundation, I advocated for vulnerable communities in earthquake relief. Additionally, I founded an initiative for migrant students in Rotterdam-South and I have been committed to improving educational opportunities for secondary school students with a migration background. Next, I gave guest lectures across the Netherlands to educate the younger generation about climate change and equitable energy transitions, emphasising the importance of a fair transition for all communities. What does it mean for you to nominated to the ECHO award? I feel very honoured to have been nominated on behalf of TU Delft. My commitment to community engagement is part of who I am, and therefore the ECHO Award is more than just a recognition; It offers me an opportunity to further expand my contributions to a more inclusive society. As an ECHO Ambassador, I plan to expand my efforts in promoting equality and sustainability, while inspiring others to take action for a more equitable World. TJ Rivera How has your background influenced your academic journey? My background as a Filipino in a Dutch-speaking bachelor’s programme made my academic journey both challenging and enriching. Being gay in a male-dominated field like Architecture, where most role models were heteronormative men, added another layer of difficulty. It was intimidating to not see people like me represented. However, this experience fuelled my belief that systems can and should be challenged, changed, and updated. I aimed to bring a fresh perspective, advocating for greater diversity and inclusivity in the field. How have you turned this into contributions to society? I translated my personal challenges into tangible contributions by advocating for inclusivity within architecture. Together with like-minded individuals, I began exploring the intersection of identity, sexuality, and architecture, and collaborated with my faculty’s diversity team to raise awareness. As I became known for my work with the queer community, I saw an opportunity to create lasting change. I co-revived ARGUS, the once-inactive study association for the Master of Architecture, which now serves as a platform to discuss and address issues of diversity within the field. This initiative continues to foster a more inclusive academic environment. What does it mean for you to be nominated to the Echo award? Being nominated for the ECHO Award is a significant milestone in my journey to expand my mission beyond the confines of my faculty. This national platform provides the opportunity to raise awareness and advocate for social justice on a larger scale. I believe students are key to driving change, and my focus is on amplifying the voices of the queer community, which is often overlooked. The ECHO Award will enable me to form partnerships with organizations and universities, further promoting diversity, inclusivity, and equality. It’s a chance to create broader, tangible change, addressing the needs of those who often go unheard. Pravesha Ramsundersingh How has your background influenced your academic journey? As a woman in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics), my background has been a powerful motivator to challenge gender disparities within Computer Science. Experiencing firsthand the underrepresentation of women in this field, I have been driven to not only excel academically but also become an advocate for diversity. Through leadership roles in the Faculty and Central Student Councils, I’ve focused on creating an inclusive environment that supports women and minority students, ensuring that everyone has the opportunity to succeed. How have you turned this into contributions to society? I’ve translated my experiences into actionable contributions by actively advocating for DEI at TU Delft. I ensured sexual education and consent training for 3,000 freshmen students, and I led initiatives like the Social Safety Initiatives Conference alongside the Dutch National Coordinator against Racism and Discrimination. In my student governance roles, I pushed for policies that address gender discrimination and social safety concerns, creating a more supportive environment for students of all backgrounds to thrive in both academic and social spaces. What does it mean for you to nominated to the ECHO award? Being nominated for the ECHO Award is an incredible honour that highlights the importance of the work I have done to promote DEI. It inspires me to continue advocating for systemic change in the tech industry and academia. This nomination reaffirms my commitment to driving equity in STEM, ensuring that future generations have more inclusive opportunities. It also motivates me to keep pushing boundaries and empower others to take action for a more just and equal society. The ECHO Award Every year ECHO, Center for Diversity Policy, invites colleges and universities to nominate socially active students who make a difference in the field of Diversity & Inclusion for the ECHO Award 2024. The ECHO Award calls attention to the specific experiences that students with a non-Western background* carry with them and the way they manage to turn these experiences into a constructive contribution to society. Winners are selected by an independent jury and may attend a full-service Summercourse at UCLA in the United States in 2025. Read more: ECHO Award - ECHO (echo-net.nl)